Forum

Please or Register to create posts and topics.

PADRES AT COLO

PreviousPage 7 of 14Next

Great base running Ty!

Paddack looking like 2019 Paddack again.....Thank goodness.

But 5 runs isn’t enough.

Won’t feel comfortable till there’s at least an 8 run lead.

I think Tatis took his eye off the throw to find the bag.

Not an easy play.

Hosmer should have gone to first IMO.

 

Now that Paddack was really in a groovy, and the freakin defense f.... it up 🙁

Nice job Paddock coming back for the K to end the inning

Now let's add another run to ease my anxiety

 

 

Quote from MrPadre19 on August 30, 2020, 1:59 pm

I think Tatis took his eye off the throw to find the bag.

Not an easy play.

Hosmer should have gone to first IMO.

 

Probably, although I don't know if Paddack would be there on time, I think he got a late jump to the bag, what upsets me is that Paddack was looking at 7 SHO innings, that would've being great for his confidence and for the bullpen.

Quote from MrPadre19 on August 30, 2020, 1:59 pm

I think Tatis took his eye off the throw to find the bag.

Not an easy play.

Hosmer should have gone to first IMO.

 

No issue with him going to 2nd ... momentum going that way and a clear out if Tatis caught the ball. Would have been a much more difficult play to stop - spin - throw to 1B to a moving Paddack. The throw was on line chest high and ahead of the runner ... can't really as more of Hosmer.

Tatis should have been given the error ... they, for now, have given it to Hosmer.

Cost Paddack 2 runs and 12 extra pitches and likely cuts his day shorter than it should be given his real low pitch count to that point. Pen comes in sooner ... takes some away for tomorrow's pen availability.

Side: not only did the official scorer give Hosmer the error on the throw ... he apparently considered the runner having beaten the throw and subsequently called the two runs earned against Paddack. There were two outs and that runner would have been clearly out if the catch was made. He was safe because of the error ... should be unearned.

this Cronenworth guy has a chance to be good!

Way to go Jake, I know it's still early but the old saying about not trading with Tampa  might be over. Not bad for a throw in . Remember when we were excited about him pitching?

Quote from fenn68 on August 30, 2020, 2:09 pm
Quote from MrPadre19 on August 30, 2020, 1:59 pm

I think Tatis took his eye off the throw to find the bag.

Not an easy play.

Hosmer should have gone to first IMO.

 

No issue with him going to 2nd ... momentum going that way and a clear out if Tatis caught the ball. Would have been a much more difficult play to stop - spin - throw to 1B to a moving Paddack. The throw was on line chest high and ahead of the runner ... can't really as more of Hosmer.

Tatis should have been given the error ... they, for now, have given it to Hosmer.

Cost Paddack 2 runs and 12 extra pitches and likely cuts his day shorter than it should be given his real low pitch count to that point. Pen comes in sooner ... takes some away for tomorrow's pen availability.

Side: not only did the official scorer give Hosmer the error on the throw ... he apparently considered the runner having beaten the throw and subsequently called the two runs earned against Paddack. There were two outs and that runner would have been clearly out if the catch was made. He was safe because of the error ... should be unearned.

Official scorer reversed part of his decision from earned to unearned run ... that is righteous. Error still on Hosmer.

PreviousPage 7 of 14Next