Forum
Off Season Thread
Quote from MrPadre19 on November 11, 2019, 11:18 amWhat you see is Dickersons OPS as a platoon player only hitting against RH pitching.
He had 201 AB's vs. RH pitching and 58 against LH.
Maybe I should have clarified but Mancini is a .900 OPS player playing everyday against all pitchers.
Almost identical splits actually.....and getting better each year and 27.
Dickersons OPS against LH pitching per season:
2019-.782
2018-.735
2017-.820
2016-.589
And this was in very limited AB's against LH's......I would guess would be lower if he faced them more.
I'm fine with Dickerson as a platoon player if you want to match him with Renfroe....but I feel Mancini can play everyday and give us more power against both RH and LH pitchers.
So platoon Dickerson and Renfoe in RF and play Mancini everyday in LF.
What you see is Dickersons OPS as a platoon player only hitting against RH pitching.
He had 201 AB's vs. RH pitching and 58 against LH.
Maybe I should have clarified but Mancini is a .900 OPS player playing everyday against all pitchers.
Almost identical splits actually.....and getting better each year and 27.
Dickersons OPS against LH pitching per season:
2019-.782
2018-.735
2017-.820
2016-.589
And this was in very limited AB's against LH's......I would guess would be lower if he faced them more.
I'm fine with Dickerson as a platoon player if you want to match him with Renfroe....but I feel Mancini can play everyday and give us more power against both RH and LH pitchers.
So platoon Dickerson and Renfoe in RF and play Mancini everyday in LF.
Quote from LynchMob on November 11, 2019, 6:08 pmThanks, DN.
Changing subject ... here's an interesting Q&A from fangraphs.com ...
https://blogs.fangraphs.com/craig-edwards-fangraphs-chat-11-7-2019/
AverageJoe: If the Sox do indeed move Betts, could something like Betts + Price for Myers + Urias make sense for the Padres and Sox? Price and Myers line up well in terms of remaining years and while Price provides more value/$ than Meyers that trade off helps make up for Urias having grater excess value than Betts.
Craig Edwards: As for that trade, it might make some sense, but would be a ton of payroll for the Padres without getting the starter they really need.
Thanks, DN.
Changing subject ... here's an interesting Q&A from fangraphs.com ...
https://blogs.fangraphs.com/craig-edwards-fangraphs-chat-11-7-2019/
|
AverageJoe: If the Sox do indeed move Betts, could something like Betts + Price for Myers + Urias make sense for the Padres and Sox? Price and Myers line up well in terms of remaining years and while Price provides more value/$ than Meyers that trade off helps make up for Urias having grater excess value than Betts.
|
|
Craig Edwards: As for that trade, it might make some sense, but would be a ton of payroll for the Padres without getting the starter they really need.
|
Quote from dusty on November 11, 2019, 6:56 pmAlright, I feel like diving in. Been a while since I have had the opportunity to post here but it's that time of year for dreaming and excitement and the Padres are really telegraphing that finally, we may see some fireworks. I really believe the Padres may be willing to attach a pretty damn good prospect to move Myers' contract to allow them to sign more than just Cole/Stras/Wheeler. Unless they have deals for two starters - one ace and one number 2 - in place (unlikely IMO) then they need to attach a quality prospect or two to really get rid of that deal or 15 per. So, if I were running the org, I would look into the following moves and setting up the roster as follows (I expect some slack and pushback and criticism but whatever feed it to me):
Trade Myers and attach Weathers with a catching prospect (Hunt, Torrens or A. Allen) to clear major money. (-18 mil Net -2 40 man)
Deal for Marte - that Arias and Cantillo package I saw floating around feels like it would make the deal happen...Marte for two years (if i am not mistaken) and on a very team-friendly deal while solving a team need. (+12 mil Net+1 40 Man)
Sign Dickerson - Solves another Issue...really clears up the outfield problem (+7.5 mil Net +1 40 Man)
Sign Cole - Ace to anchor/co-anchor the rotation for the next 7 years (30 mil Net +1 40 Man)
Sign Sogard (1 Mil Net +1 40 Man)
Trade Urias, Renfroe for Caleb Smith (-3.4 mil Net -1 40 Man)
Trade Lucchesi, Morejon, Potts, Marcano for Snell (+6 mil Net -1 40 Man)
Sign both Adam Jones and Akiyama (6Mil Net +1)
Trade Margot for Low A prospect (-2.1 mil Net+2)
Trade/DFA Margevicious possible PTBNL (Net-1)
Other moves to open up 40 man space:
Trade France
Trade Garcia
Trade Martini
What this does:
ROTATION
Cole
Snell
Paddack
Lamet/Richards/Lauer/Smith (other two fill bullpen and provide depth in case of injury)
Lamet/Richards/Lauer/Smith (other two fill bullpen and provide depth in case of injury)
LINEUP
Tatis
Jones/Akiyama
Marte
Machado
Dickerson
Hosmer
Mejia/Sogard
Sogard/Hedges
Pitcher
BENCH
Hedges/Mejia
Kinsler
Cordero
Martini/Garcia/France
Jones/Akiyama
BULLPEN
Yates
Munoz
Strahm
Castillo
Wingenter
Perdomo/Diaz
Lauer/Lamet/Smith/Richards
Lauer/Lamet/Smith/Richards
So what does this do to payroll (I am sure I am way off basis but I think we would see a net increase of 39.1 mil unless we get creative with our TOR starter and we would have a breakeven on 40 man spots I believe. Also this would give us our 26 man roster. Seems like a pipe dream with that Payroll but who knows what these guys do to make moves and bring a winning team back to San Diego
Alright, I feel like diving in. Been a while since I have had the opportunity to post here but it's that time of year for dreaming and excitement and the Padres are really telegraphing that finally, we may see some fireworks. I really believe the Padres may be willing to attach a pretty damn good prospect to move Myers' contract to allow them to sign more than just Cole/Stras/Wheeler. Unless they have deals for two starters - one ace and one number 2 - in place (unlikely IMO) then they need to attach a quality prospect or two to really get rid of that deal or 15 per. So, if I were running the org, I would look into the following moves and setting up the roster as follows (I expect some slack and pushback and criticism but whatever feed it to me):
Trade Myers and attach Weathers with a catching prospect (Hunt, Torrens or A. Allen) to clear major money. (-18 mil Net -2 40 man)
Deal for Marte - that Arias and Cantillo package I saw floating around feels like it would make the deal happen...Marte for two years (if i am not mistaken) and on a very team-friendly deal while solving a team need. (+12 mil Net+1 40 Man)
Sign Dickerson - Solves another Issue...really clears up the outfield problem (+7.5 mil Net +1 40 Man)
Sign Cole - Ace to anchor/co-anchor the rotation for the next 7 years (30 mil Net +1 40 Man)
Sign Sogard (1 Mil Net +1 40 Man)
Trade Urias, Renfroe for Caleb Smith (-3.4 mil Net -1 40 Man)
Trade Lucchesi, Morejon, Potts, Marcano for Snell (+6 mil Net -1 40 Man)
Sign both Adam Jones and Akiyama (6Mil Net +1)
Trade Margot for Low A prospect (-2.1 mil Net+2)
Trade/DFA Margevicious possible PTBNL (Net-1)
Other moves to open up 40 man space:
Trade France
Trade Garcia
Trade Martini
What this does:
ROTATION
Cole
Snell
Paddack
Lamet/Richards/Lauer/Smith (other two fill bullpen and provide depth in case of injury)
Lamet/Richards/Lauer/Smith (other two fill bullpen and provide depth in case of injury)
LINEUP
Tatis
Jones/Akiyama
Marte
Machado
Dickerson
Hosmer
Mejia/Sogard
Sogard/Hedges
Pitcher
BENCH
Hedges/Mejia
Kinsler
Cordero
Martini/Garcia/France
Jones/Akiyama
BULLPEN
Yates
Munoz
Strahm
Castillo
Wingenter
Perdomo/Diaz
Lauer/Lamet/Smith/Richards
Lauer/Lamet/Smith/Richards
So what does this do to payroll (I am sure I am way off basis but I think we would see a net increase of 39.1 mil unless we get creative with our TOR starter and we would have a breakeven on 40 man spots I believe. Also this would give us our 26 man roster. Seems like a pipe dream with that Payroll but who knows what these guys do to make moves and bring a winning team back to San Diego
Quote from dusty on November 11, 2019, 7:00 pmI guess the question is can we make these moves and add this payroll or can we make these moves without surrendering any of our top 6 prospects?
I guess the question is can we make these moves and add this payroll or can we make these moves without surrendering any of our top 6 prospects?
Quote from MrPadre19 on November 11, 2019, 7:11 pmCouple things.
I can’t see the Rays trading Snell....but if they did they would need a lot higher rated prospects than Morejon/Potts/Marciano to offset Lucchesi.Plus if you’re gonna trade Urias and Renfroe for Smith he’s gonna be your #3......not a #5/bullpen piece.
Couple things.
I can’t see the Rays trading Snell....but if they did they would need a lot higher rated prospects than Morejon/Potts/Marciano to offset Lucchesi.
Plus if you’re gonna trade Urias and Renfroe for Smith he’s gonna be your #3......not a #5/bullpen piece.
Quote from JasonE135 on November 11, 2019, 7:13 pmWhy would we even want Smith? He is similar to but < Lauer. If we don't trade Urias for him, we can keep Urias as our 2B. Sogard has had only 1 good year anyway and has much less cost control. Snell would cost Gore++.
Why would we even want Smith? He is similar to but < Lauer. If we don't trade Urias for him, we can keep Urias as our 2B. Sogard has had only 1 good year anyway and has much less cost control. Snell would cost Gore++.
Quote from TatisJr on November 11, 2019, 7:25 pmDusty I like most of what you put together, but I wouldn’t deal Urias and Renfroe for Smith. Like Mr. P said I don’t see TB dealing Snell and that package is far too light. I’d hate to lose Margots defense and see Jones/Akiyama or Marte take over the duties in Petco. That’s a steep drop off. I feel Jones and Marte are corner outfielders at this point. Cole, Sogard, Marte and Dickerson would all be welcomed additions in my book.
Dusty I like most of what you put together, but I wouldn’t deal Urias and Renfroe for Smith. Like Mr. P said I don’t see TB dealing Snell and that package is far too light. I’d hate to lose Margots defense and see Jones/Akiyama or Marte take over the duties in Petco. That’s a steep drop off. I feel Jones and Marte are corner outfielders at this point. Cole, Sogard, Marte and Dickerson would all be welcomed additions in my book.
Quote from dusty on November 11, 2019, 7:32 pmSmith's numbers are very similar to Lauer's except he has a better WAR (not by much), better WHIP and better strikeout numbers although Lauer has better ERA. Lauer is 4 years younger though so may not be a good deal...for some reason i like Smith a lot more than i probably should. So maybe I am off there...also most likely way off on what it would cost for Snell, just thinking the Padres can capitalize on his down year. I do believe we will have to give up something to be able to get something so I guess you would give a top prospect in addition to what I suggested for Snell.
Smith's numbers are very similar to Lauer's except he has a better WAR (not by much), better WHIP and better strikeout numbers although Lauer has better ERA. Lauer is 4 years younger though so may not be a good deal...for some reason i like Smith a lot more than i probably should. So maybe I am off there...also most likely way off on what it would cost for Snell, just thinking the Padres can capitalize on his down year. I do believe we will have to give up something to be able to get something so I guess you would give a top prospect in addition to what I suggested for Snell.
Quote from dusty on November 11, 2019, 7:47 pmQuote from TatisJr on November 11, 2019, 7:25 pmDusty I like most of what you put together, but I wouldn’t deal Urias and Renfroe for Smith. Like Mr. P said I don’t see TB dealing Snell and that package is far too light. I’d hate to lose Margots defense and see Jones/Akiyama or Marte take over the duties in Petco. That’s a steep drop off. I feel Jones and Marte are corner outfielders at this point. Cole, Sogard, Marte and Dickerson would all be welcomed additions in my book.
Yea I probably am selling Renfroe and Urias very light on that deal...I would probably add that to the Snell deal instead. Plus keeping Margot rather than signing Jones and Akiyama would save us 4 mil and make defense much better. I just think the Padres need to figure something out on offense when they have both Margot and Hedges in together. I think Hedges is a major tool/factor in bringing in a Cole/Stras which is the main reason why I left him on the roster. Also, if we can improve the offense drastically, then keeping him in the lineup isn't as big of a liability. Two dark horse contenders for pushing Urias are Quiroz and Owen Miller (possible trade piece). I think that Urias could still be a major factor in the lineup (my inclusion to deal him is more based off the fact that the FO have voiced their displeasure in 2B productivity.
Quote from TatisJr on November 11, 2019, 7:25 pmDusty I like most of what you put together, but I wouldn’t deal Urias and Renfroe for Smith. Like Mr. P said I don’t see TB dealing Snell and that package is far too light. I’d hate to lose Margots defense and see Jones/Akiyama or Marte take over the duties in Petco. That’s a steep drop off. I feel Jones and Marte are corner outfielders at this point. Cole, Sogard, Marte and Dickerson would all be welcomed additions in my book.
Yea I probably am selling Renfroe and Urias very light on that deal...I would probably add that to the Snell deal instead. Plus keeping Margot rather than signing Jones and Akiyama would save us 4 mil and make defense much better. I just think the Padres need to figure something out on offense when they have both Margot and Hedges in together. I think Hedges is a major tool/factor in bringing in a Cole/Stras which is the main reason why I left him on the roster. Also, if we can improve the offense drastically, then keeping him in the lineup isn't as big of a liability. Two dark horse contenders for pushing Urias are Quiroz and Owen Miller (possible trade piece). I think that Urias could still be a major factor in the lineup (my inclusion to deal him is more based off the fact that the FO have voiced their displeasure in 2B productivity.
Quote from JasonE135 on November 11, 2019, 8:04 pmI would personally kill for Snell. If we got him we wouldn't even have to sign Cole. He is a CY Young award winner and just the kind of ACE that we need. He also has tremendous value as he is on an extremely team-friendly contract. I just don't think there is any way they would trade him.
I also love Hedges defense. As far as the lineup having both of Hedges and Margot in it at the same time, if we did sign Akiyama as you suggested then Margot would mostly play against left-handed pitchers, who he has good numbers against. Hedges I would imagine will play far more often against left-handers next year too. If they are platoon-type players I have no qualms about their bats. So yes, I like those parts of your idea. Dickerson as well.
I would personally kill for Snell. If we got him we wouldn't even have to sign Cole. He is a CY Young award winner and just the kind of ACE that we need. He also has tremendous value as he is on an extremely team-friendly contract. I just don't think there is any way they would trade him.
I also love Hedges defense. As far as the lineup having both of Hedges and Margot in it at the same time, if we did sign Akiyama as you suggested then Margot would mostly play against left-handed pitchers, who he has good numbers against. Hedges I would imagine will play far more often against left-handers next year too. If they are platoon-type players I have no qualms about their bats. So yes, I like those parts of your idea. Dickerson as well.




